Monday, August 27, 2012

How to better understand Federal Leadership - Nu Leadership Series


"Great leaders are almost always great simplifiers, who can cut through argument, debate and doubt to offer a solution everybody can understand."
Colin Powell

Understanding employees is a key ingredient for most organizations. Because the federal system on the impersonal requirements of federal employees in the workplace? What you can do effective leaders do to alleviate this attitude in the workplace? The rigidity of the federal structure takes its roots from Weber and Taylor. Taylor models provide scientific specialization of labor in the narrow specialization of jobs, while Weber provides organizational standardization. These theories have combined to create a bureaucratic machine.

Unfortunately, this damping dependent stiffness organizational innovative creative and unconventional. Nadler and Tushman, authors of competing by Design, argue that employees become alienated by the lack of variety, creativity and motivation involved in this type of system. Even if the federal government is an open system, is heavily influenced by outside forces. Consequently, the dynamics policies often influence the structure of the government.

Influencing the government bureaucracy can be done in a four-step process, which is to (1) create a critical mass of key groups, (2) create a political dynamic, (3) build the perception of momentum in support of change symbols, and (4) construct and maintain a sense of stability, reducing the anxiety induced political activity. Leadership experts - Zenger, Musselwhite, Hurson and Perrin - explain that contemporary managers who are reluctant to change their organizations are discovering the decline in quality, productivity, morale and market share.

Finally, these organizational constraints make it difficult for organizational changes in the federal system. Therefore, federal officials need to be both persistent and patient, when the introduction of organizational changes.

References:

Nadler, D. and Tushman, M. (1997). Competing by Design. New York: Oxford University Press.

Zenger, J. Musselwhite, E., Hurson, K., and Perrin, C. (1991). Leadership in a team environment. Training and Development, 45 (10), 46.

by Daryl D. Green ......

No comments:

Post a Comment